U.S. Supreme Court ruling puts further pressure on coal

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled with the Environmental Protection Agency supporting regulations that limit pollution emissions that cross state lines, one of a number of recent rulings that tighten the gauntlet around the widespread use of coal. While building new power plants takes time, taken ...

This item has been archived in line with our efforts to keep our content relevant and up to date for our readership. For further assistance, please contact your Customer Success Manager or email ClientEngagementTeam@luxresearchinc.com. Thank you!

Related Research

Indonesia steps up efforts with ban on new coal-fired power plants in new and gradual decarbonization roadmap

News Commentary | July 08, 2021

Earlier this year, Indonesia reported it would favor its domestic coal over decarbonization. Lux viewed this as a shortsighted decision that provided near‑term self‑resilience but left the country vulnerable in the long term. Five months later, Indonesia has slightly changed its tune, announcing it ... Not part of subscription

Dutch court rules that contributing to climate change is contrary to unwritten standards of care and orders Shell to slash GHG emissions

News Commentary | June 01, 2021

Leaving your cellar hatch open unattended makes you culpable in most countries' courts if someone falls, not due to an explicit law against open cellar hatches but for failing to apply a "good standard of care." The Dutch court ruled that contributing to climate change is as obviously dangerous as ... Not part of subscription

EPA move to strengthen clean emissions regulations is more symbolic than impactful

News Commentary | February 02, 2022

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s proposed rule to reinstate the limit on mercury emissions for coal‑fired plants reverses a Trump administration decision to not enforce it. But most utilities have already complied with the rule, which was first enforced more than 10 years ago, by ... Not part of subscription